.png)
_edited_edited.png)
EA Sports College Football is back and every gamer and sports enthusiast is sweating it out in front of the EA student body trying to bring a trophy to campus. Offenses are potent and run-pass options are spreading defenses out, trying to find weaknesses in formations. Finding a defense that is best for your program and more importantly, your play style, is essential to meeting goals and not finding yourself on the hot seat. Allow this series to be a guide as we break down defenses and build a college football powerhouse. This week’s breakdown: The 3-3-5 Defense.
The 3-3-5 Defense
Designed to combat the spread and keep your players on the field regardless of offensive personnel, the 3-3-5 defense helps schools with smaller, quicker defensive linemen and linebackers that can shoot gaps instead of two-gapping or maintaining control of two running lanes until the ball carrier has committed to one. Having two or more talented strong safeties and a secondary that plays the pass and run well is the key to making this a primary defense. In College Football 25, this defense well-suited to defend against the pass, but it is difficult to master.
The 3-3-5 defense is better left to the experienced and patient gamer as it will require pre-snap DL and LB movement to compensate for poor pre-snap alignments and post-snap gap responsibilities. Instead of the defensive linemen shooting gaps, they attack the shoulders of the offensive line, often leading them into the flow of the offense instead of disrupting it. Without the pre-snap movements, the DL will play 3-4 principles that ultimately affect the LB’s and strong safety’s effectiveness in the run game. This is manageable in most situations but can be game-changing in crucial times.
Those who use this defense will find success using the worst-rated defensive end on the field, the backside SS or the free safety, but they have to be great in user coverage.
Ease of use ranking: 6/10
The 3-3-5 vs. the Run
When it comes to stopping the running game the 3-3-5 defense is not quite built for stuffing the run but it can get the job done. It will require solid pre-snap adjustments to ensure the DL and LB’s can set the edge and push ball carriers back to the middle of the defense. Users must create an edge player through force with outside LB or SS blitzes called to the backside of the offensive set. Lastly, your SS’s must be exceptional tacklers as outside runs will funnel to them more often than not. Any missed tackles from edge players will lead to big gains because of secondary spacing.
Most Effective Run Defenses
Listed below are the most effective categories of run defense formations available in EA Sports College Football 25:
Stack Will-Sam 3
Pros: Sets an immediate edge on both sides to keep runners inside the tackle.
Cons: Seam routes and swing routes from the backfield.
Stack Mike-Will 3
Pros: Disrupts weak side off-tackle and sets a strong side edge.
Cons: Middle-draw plays and swing routes from the backfield.
Stack Tampa Sim Pressure
Pros: Speed blitz with a backside edge.
Cons: Strong side smash concepts, involving hitch and trailing flag routes.
The 3-3-5 vs. the Pass
The spread offense keeps speed on the field and defenses spread thin as defenders attempt to cover holes created by space and speed. The 3-3-5 was built for this situation by allowing users to keep five defensive backs on the field to match any offensive personnel. College Football 25 is a passing team's paradise but there are a few guidelines users must follow to give themselves the best chance to control the skies. Any six-man blitzes or true man coverage will leave the defense exposed to big passing gains, and cover four will keep receivers in front of defenders but fail to stop any short and intermediate routes. Zone blitzes are only effective if they create pressure to throw the ball sooner than desired or cause a sack. Shell coverages will pull defenders out of throwing windows and base alignments and occasionally make the defense vulnerable to quick outside screens.
Most Effective Coverages
Here is a breakdown of the most effective types of pass coverage formations available in EA Sports College Football 25:
Stack Cover 3 Drop
Pros: Medium and deep zones are covered well with every wide receiver capped by a safety over the top.
Cons: 3-man rush so the secondary, at times, must be able to cover four seconds or longer.
3 High 3 Double Cloud
Pros: Short and medium zones are covered with every WR capped.
Cons: 3-man rush and deep outs.
Stack Mid Blitz 1
Pros: Sending five vs. five pressure.
Cons: LBs can get mismatched with an empty set.
Split Cover 2 Invert
Pros: Great full zone coverage.
Cons: The user must be the FS and control the post and dig routes.
The 3-3-5 Then, Now
Although a relatively new defensive concept in 2014, the 3-3-5 has seen massive changes from EA’s 2014 title compared to College Football 2025. The ability of defensive lines to slant and shoot gaps with speed often now depends on power moves instead of finesse to quickly penetrate the backfield and create the havoc a 3-3-5 formation is looking for. Pre-snap slant adjustments are not honored by the entire line, and linebackers and linemen often share run gap responsibilities. Users unfamiliar with or too slow in their pre-snap adjustments will have to quickly change formations to reinforce running lanes.
Linebackers in the 2014 version were always pass-game liabilities, and College Football 2025 has done little to change that. While LBs certainly make plays on the ball significantly better, they still often drop too deep or shallow into their zones and become very cemented to an area regardless of offensive route combos. There are still too many instances when defensive players are covering grass instead of finding game-action, and player awareness ratings do not change the AI’s responsiveness to being out of position once the play is developing.
The secondary was rumored to have received a major performance upgrade since 2014, and though the animations and fluidity have changed, there are still many occasions when the secondary engages in many of the same antics as the previous title. Zone coverages often fail to account for crossing routes, like digs across the formation. Many cornerbacks turn and chase, often vacating their zones and opening gaps in the secondary. There is a noticeable difference in how defenders attack the ball while it is in the air with different body contortions and angles, allowing users to make a play on the daunting deep crossing routes that plagued the game in 2014.
Conclusion
College Football 25’s version of the 3-3-5 defense is not for the faint of heart or the novice gamer. It requires an intense knowledge of defensive scheming and an even better understanding of the gameplay mechanics. For those looking for an extra challenge while building the perfect program the 3-3-5 defense will prove a formidable foe. The user must recruit well, call the correct plays often and be decisive during the pre-snap window for this defense to work its magic.
If this sounds like a challenge worth tackling, then recruit well and make sure that your players can tackle well, too. If it sounds like it may be too much, then come back when we break down our next defense, the base 4-3.
.png)
.png)
コメント