top of page
Writer's pictureMichael Brown

NCAA Approves New Transfer Rule

NCAA Headquarters Indianapolis
© Mykal McEldowney/IndyStar / USA TODAY NETWORK

In a groundbreaking move, the NCAA’s Division I Council has ushered in a new era for collegiate athletics by approving emergency legislation that grants undergraduate athletes the freedom to transfer and play immediately, contingent upon meeting specific academic requirements.




This landmark decision promises immediate eligibility for athletes transferring during the 2023-24 academic year, provided they meet academic benchmarks at their new institution. While the rule abolishes previous limitations on the number of transfers, concerns linger regarding its potential impact on graduation rates. This shift reflects ongoing legal challenges and aims to adapt to the changing landscape of college athletics, including the evolving realm of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights.



Transfer Rule: The Greenlight

The NCAA’s Division I Council has greenlit an emergency legislation allowing undergraduate athletes to transfer and play immediately, subject to specific academic criteria. While the decision awaits final confirmation at the end of Thursday’s meetings and formal approval by the NCAA’s executive board on Monday, it is anticipated to pass smoothly.




Key Points:

1. Immediate Eligibility: Under the new rule, undergraduate athletes who transfer during the 2023-24 academic year can play immediately if they meet academic eligibility requirements and fulfill progress-towards-degree benchmarks at their new institution.


2. No Limit on Transfers: Unlike previous regulations, the legislation does not restrict the number of times an athlete can transfer. However, they cannot transfer midyear and play for a second school within the same season.


3. Concerns Raised: While the rule aims to streamline the transfer process, concerns have been voiced regarding its potential long-term impact on graduation rates. Coaches like Oregon’s Dan Lanning question the significance of the degree if athletes frequently switch schools, highlighting the importance of maintaining progress towards graduation amidst multiple transfers.



4. Evolution from Previous Rules: The new legislation replaces the NCAA’s one-time transfer rule, which mandated athletes to sit out a year if they transferred again after playing immediately at their first transfer destination, unless they obtained a waiver from the NCAA.


5. Legal Context: The proposal comes in response to legal challenges, including a West Virginia judge’s ruling and a lawsuit by the U.S. Department of Justice, asserting that NCAA transfer rules restrain athletes’ labor market opportunities and violate antitrust laws.


6. Transfer Window and Decision Timeline: With college football’s 15-day transfer window open until April 30, players have the opportunity to enter the portal and explore transfer options. They have 15 days to decide whether to transfer or remain with their current team.


7. NIL Opportunities: Additionally, the DI Council is advancing legislation to enable schools to facilitate sponsorship deals for athletes, although direct payment from schools to athletes remains prohibited. This move reflects ongoing efforts to adapt to the evolving landscape of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights in college athletics.


Oregon Ducks player walking with helmet in hand after game
© Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports

In summary, the NCAA’s approval of the new transfer rule marks a significant shift in policy, offering greater flexibility to undergraduate athletes while raising pertinent questions about academic accountability and the evolving dynamics of collegiate sports.



Komentarze


Michigan Football
Blue Screen
bottom of page